All of the Tea Party types are talking about less government, which I can only assume means cutting entitlements. Most every Republican I’ve heard talks about less spending AND cutting taxes at the same time. So, two-part question:
1. Are people on welfare and other government entitlement programs who voted for some random anti-Pelosi Tea Party candidate going to be self-aware enough to realize how their own vote hurt them?
2. Can anyone explain how the Republicans’ plan is even feasible without cutting pretty much all entitlements (see above question) or engaging in the duplicitous accounting that Bush used?